Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ScrumStudy Exam SMC Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for ScrumStudy's SMC exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 1
[All SMC Questions]

You are the Scrum Master for a team that is working on a project for a chemical engineering company. During

one of the Sprints, the Product Owner suggests changes to the Acceptance Criteria on the basis of new

requirements by the stakeholders. Which of the following best describes the steps that should be taken next in

this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carmen
27 days ago
Haha, yeah Coletta's got a point. Those stakeholders, always keeping us on our toes! But seriously, C is the way to go here. Gotta keep the Scrum process clean and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
29 days ago
I'm leaning towards C as well. Seems like the most logical way to handle the situation. Although, I do wonder if the Product Owner will try to sneak in some last-minute changes again. Gotta watch out for those stakeholders, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Tyra
19 hours ago
Definitely, we need to stay vigilant with the Product Owner and stakeholders to avoid last-minute changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
6 days ago
I agree, the deliverable should be rejected and added to the backlog for a future Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
10 days ago
Yes, C does seem like the best option. It's important to prioritize the new requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
1 months ago
Option B seems reasonable too, but I'm not sure the Product Owner should just reject the deliverable without adding it to the backlog. Gotta keep that transparency, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 months ago
I agree with Azzie. The Scrum team shouldn't be expected to rework an already developed deliverable in the same Sprint. It's better to handle it as a new requirement in the backlog.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
5 days ago
C) The deliverable is rejected on the basis of the changed requirements, and added to the Prioritized Product Backlog with the new Acceptance Criteria to be worked on in a subsequent Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
13 days ago
A) You will direct the Scrum team to re-work the User Story in the same Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gladys
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Option D also seems valid, as we need to consider the team's bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
2 months ago
Interesting scenario. I think the best approach here is to go with option C - the deliverable should be rejected due to the changed requirements, and then added to the Prioritized Product Backlog with the new Acceptance Criteria for a future Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
Jade
25 days ago
Yes, rejecting the deliverable and adding it to the backlog for a future Sprint ensures that the new requirements are properly addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical step to take in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alecia
2 months ago
I agree with Simona. It makes sense to reject the deliverable and add it to the backlog for the next Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77