Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum Exam SPS Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's SPS exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All SPS Questions]

Which statements best describe a Nexus Sprint Review?

(choose the best two answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When multiple Scrum Teams work from the same Product Backlog, they should choose the Product Backlog items that they can deliver as part of an Integrated Increment, which is the combined work of all the Scrum Teams that meets the Nexus Sprint Goal 11. The Developers, who are the people in the Scrum Teams who are accountable for creating and delivering the Increment, should pull work in agreement with the Product Owner, who is the person who is accountable for maximizing the value of the product and the work performed and integrated by the Scrum Teams 11. The Developers and the Product Owner should collaborate to select the Product Backlog items that are most valuable, feasible, and aligned with the Nexus Sprint Goal 2233. Therefore, statement B is the correct answer.

Statement A is incorrect because it implies that the Scrum Teams choose the Weighted Shortest Job First, which is a prioritization technique that ranks Product Backlog items based on their value and cost 44. However, the Scrum Guide does not prescribe any specific technique for ordering the Product Backlog, and the Product Owner is the sole person responsible for managing the Product Backlog [5]. Statement C is incorrect because it suggests that each Scrum Team takes an equal number of items, which may not reflect the value, complexity, or dependencies of the items 1122. Statement D is incorrect because it assumes that the Scrum Team with the highest velocity pulls Product Backlog items first, which may not be the best way to optimize the value delivery and integration across the Nexus 1122. Statement E is incorrect because it proposes that the Product Owner should provide each team with its own Product Backlog, which would create confusion, inconsistency, and duplication of work. Having multiple Product Backlogs would also undermine the transparency and alignment that are essential for scaling Scrum 1122.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lisbeth
8 hours ago
B is a bit off, since the Nexus Sprint Review doesn't replace the individual Scrum Team Sprint Reviews. Those still happen, but the Nexus event is an additional step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
23 days ago
I'm not sure about B and C, but I think A and D are correct because the Nexus Sprint Review is about the overall progress of the Nexus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
25 days ago
A and C seem like the most accurate descriptions of a Nexus Sprint Review. It's a container for the individual Scrum Teams to showcase their work, which aligns with the feedback on the Integrated Increment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
29 days ago
I agree with Felice, A and D make sense because the Nexus Sprint Review is where the integrated work is demonstrated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
1 months ago
I think A and D are the best answers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a