Scrum Exam PSM-II Topic 3 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-II exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 3

At the seventh Sprint Review, the stakeholders seem disappointed and angry. When asked about it, they say the product being built will not meet their needs and will cost more than they anticipated spending. What factors may have led to this?

(choose the best three answers)

AThe stakeholders have not been using the Sprint Reviews to actively engage, and inspect and evaluate progress.

BThe stakeholders were not allowed to enter the development area, or be present at the Daily Scrum.

CThe Project Management Office (PMO) and its project managers have not been adequately engaged, causing the project plan to become inaccurate.

DThe Scrum Master has not ensured transparency.

EThe Product Owner has not been interacting frequently with the stakeholders and kept them aware of the progress of the project.

FChanges to the project plan were not adequately documented and shared. The change request procedure was not diligently followed.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: E

The Development Team owns the Definition of ''Done'' and is accountable for the quality of the Product Backlog items.

by Elli at Dec 09, 2022, 02:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSM-II Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Thersa

30 days ago

Man, I bet the Scrum Master was sweating bullets during that Sprint Review. Probably wishing they had a teleportation device to just disappear!

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilbert

1 months ago

Yikes, this sounds like a real dumpster fire. The Scrum Master dropped the ball on transparency, and the Product Owner is probably going to need to do some serious damage control with the stakeholders.

upvoted 0 times

Luther

13 days ago

A) The stakeholders have not been using the Sprint Reviews to actively engage, and inspect and evaluate progress.

upvoted 0 times

...

2 months ago

Oof, the PMO and change management issues definitely contributed to this mess. Sounds like a total communication breakdown. Someone should have been keeping a closer eye on the project plan.

upvoted 0 times

Stephane

2 months ago

F) Changes to the project plan were not adequately documented and shared. The change request procedure was not diligently followed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iola

2 months ago

C) The Project Management Office (PMO) and its project managers have not been adequately engaged, causing the project plan to become inaccurate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vince

2 months ago

A) The stakeholders have not been using the Sprint Reviews to actively engage, and inspect and evaluate progress.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerilyn

2 months ago

Looks like a classic case of poor stakeholder engagement. The Scrum Master and Product Owner should have been more proactive in keeping the stakeholders informed and involved. I bet they felt left in the dark the whole time.

upvoted 0 times

3 months ago

I think the stakeholders not actively engaging in Sprint Reviews could be a factor.

upvoted 0 times

...