Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum Exam PSM-II Topic 2 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-II exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 2
[All PSM-II Questions]

You have just been hired as a Scrum Master by a company new to Scrum. The company wants to use Scrum to build a new product that was conceived by the product management department. You will be the Scrum Master of two new teams that will build a first version of the product. The product management department assigns two new Product Owners, but wants more advice about the required participation with the new Scrum Teams. Which two suggestions would you offer?

(choose the best two answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Viki
2 months ago
This is like choosing between a one-legged race and a three-legged race - either way, somebody's gonna trip! I'll go with B and D, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Germaine
12 days ago
Definitely, having a single Product Backlog for all requirements will ensure transparency and alignment across both teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
13 days ago
I agree, it can get confusing if there's only one Product Owner trying to manage all the requirements for both teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 months ago
I think having two Product Owners makes sense, it will help each team stay focused on their specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslee
2 months ago
One Product Owner? That's like asking a chef to do the waiter's job too. B is the only way to keep things organized and accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
Hmm, single Product Backlog seems simpler, but I don't want any communication breakdowns between the teams. I'll go with B and D to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
2 months ago
D sounds like a good idea, but having separate backlogs could help the teams stay focused on their specific tasks. Tough call, but I'll go with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
1 months ago
Agreed. It's important for the teams to have clarity on their responsibilities and the overall product requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
1 months ago
That makes sense. Having separate backlogs could help each team focus on their specific tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
1 months ago
D) A single Product Backlog should be maintained holding all requirements for the new product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
2 months ago
B) Two Product Owners are necessary, one for each Scrum Team. They report to an overarching chief Product Owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
2 months ago
Two Product Owners? That's like having two captains on a ship - someone's gonna walk the plank! B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Jettie
28 days ago
B) Two Product Owners are necessary, one for each Scrum Team. They report to an overarching chief Product Owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
1 months ago
A) Having one Product Owner will improve the clarity of accountability to the teams and to the product management department.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theodora
2 months ago
But wouldn't having two Product Owners, one for each team, be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
2 months ago
I agree, it will make things clearer for the teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
3 months ago
I think having one Product Owner will improve accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77