Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SSM Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SSM exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All SSM Questions]

Team A has decided to use the IP Iteration to continue the finalizing Feature delivery work they have been working on for the past two Iterations. What is one effect Team A might experience by continuing to stay heads-down rather than using the IP Iteration as intended?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

One anti-pattern that emerges when teams do not spend enough time refining the backlog is that they enter new Iterations without enough Stories prepared.This can result in several negative consequences, such as:123

The team may struggle to plan and commit to the Iteration Goals, as they lack clarity, feasibility, and testability of the Stories.

The team may face delays, rework, and waste, as they encounter unanticipated dependencies, risks, or technical issues during the Iteration.

The team may deliver low-quality or incomplete Stories, as they rush to meet the Iteration deadlines or compromise on the Definition of Done.

The team may lose focus, alignment, and motivation, as they work on ambiguous or unrealistic Stories that do not deliver value to the customers or the organization.

To avoid this anti-pattern, the team should dedicate sufficient time and effort to refine the backlog on a regular basis, preferably every Iteration123Backlog Refinement is an ongoing process where the team collaborates with the Product Owner and other stakeholders to review, split, prioritize, and estimate the Stories in the Team Backlog4One of the main objectives of Backlog Refinement is to ensure that the Stories are ready for Iteration Planning, which means they are clear, feasible, testable, and small enough to be completed in a single Iteration2By doing so, the team can improve the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their work, as well as deliver value to the customers and the organization


Contribute your Thoughts:

Quiana
8 days ago
I'd go with option D. A break during the IP Iteration could help the team members refresh their motivation and come back energized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
9 days ago
I agree with Claribel. Staying focused on just the feature delivery could make the team members lose the big picture perspective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
10 days ago
I agree, it's important for team members to consider their work holistically to ensure overall success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
12 days ago
Yeah, not using the IP Iteration as intended could lead to missed opportunities for skill development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
13 days ago
I think Team A might experience a lack of learning if they stay heads-down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
14 days ago
I agree. It's important to consider team work more holistically to ensure everyone is on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
17 days ago
Option C seems the most relevant. If the team stays heads-down, they might miss the chance to take a step back and consider their teamwork as a whole.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
19 days ago
That's true, individual team members could lose an opportunity to keep their technical skills current as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
26 days ago
I think Team A might experience a lack of learning from one another if they stay heads-down.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77