Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-SPC Topic 6 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SPC exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 6
[All SAFe-SPC Questions]

An Agile Release Train prepares for PI Planning. They have both Features and Program Epics among the desirable items for this PI. However, Product Management is stuck because some Epics are too big and won't fit in this PI.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Xenia
1 months ago
What, no option for 'Throw up your hands and go home'? That's my kind of planning approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 months ago
A) Pick only those Epics that have clearly defined success criteria and might fit into the PI. Sounds like a good way to keep things simple and focused.
upvoted 0 times
Mariann
18 days ago
User 1: Let's pick only the Epics with clear success criteria for this PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
1 months ago
D) Instead of planning just the upcoming PI, plan for a longer period to cover the full duration of the Program Epics. This could be a good way to get a handle on those big Epics.
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
6 days ago
A) Pick only those Epics that have clearly defined success criteria and might fit into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
8 days ago
C) Split Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to determine what should go into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
19 days ago
B) Split Epics into Features and prioritize the Features to determine what should go into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 months ago
A) Pick only those Epics that have clearly defined success criteria and might fit into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
2 months ago
C) Split Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to determine what should go into the PI. I like the idea of considering the team's capacity when deciding what to include.
upvoted 0 times
Freida
15 days ago
User 4: Definitely. We don't want to overload the team and risk not delivering on our commitments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
17 days ago
User 3: I agree. It's important to consider the team's capacity when planning for the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 months ago
User 2: That sounds like a good approach. We need to make sure we can realistically complete everything in the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
2 months ago
User 1: Let's split the Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to decide what goes into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Levi
2 months ago
But what if we split the Epics into Features and prioritize them instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
2 months ago
I agree with Adell. It will help us focus on what's achievable in this PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
B) Split Epics into Features and prioritize the Features to determine what should go into the PI. This seems like the most logical approach to me. Breaking down those massive Epics is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Paul
29 days ago
Keshia: Absolutely, we need to make sure we can deliver value in this iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 months ago
User 3: It's important to have a clear plan and focus on achievable goals for this PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, prioritizing the Features will help us determine what to include in the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, breaking down the Epics into Features is the best way to tackle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adell
3 months ago
I think we should pick only Epics with clear success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77