Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-SGP Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 7
[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

What two visual reporting tools can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The true statement about Lean-Agile development and contracting is A. Quality is built-in through collaboration and automation. Lean-Agile development is an iterative and incremental approach to software development that emphasizes flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement. Quality is not something that is added at the end of the development cycle, but rather something that is embedded throughout the process. Lean-Agile teams collaborate with customers and stakeholders to define clear and testable acceptance criteria for each work item.They also use automation tools to perform frequent testing, integration, and deployment of the software, ensuring that the solution meets the quality standards and compliance requirements12.

1:Advanced Topic - Agile Contracts - Scaled Agile Framework2:Government - Building in Quality and Compliance - Scaled Agile Framework


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leila
27 days ago
Wait, where's the option for 'interpretive dance'? That's how I track all my government programs. Just kidding, but seriously, C and D seem like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
30 days ago
Integrated master schedules all the way! That's the bread and butter of government program management. And don't forget the spreadsheets - you can never have too many spreadsheets!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about pro formas for this type of question. I'd stick with the options that are more directly related to project tracking and reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
1 months ago
I'm going with C and D. Feature progress charts and burn-up charts give a great visual on how the program is doing.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
9 days ago
I agree, feature progress charts and burn-up charts are essential for tracking progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Doretha
2 months ago
Detailed spreadsheets and burn-up charts seem like the most logical choices here. Those would provide the necessary financial tracking and progress visualization.
upvoted 0 times
Sherman
9 days ago
Integrated master schedules could also be useful for tracking project timelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
25 days ago
I think burn-up charts would also be helpful in visualizing progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 months ago
I agree, detailed spreadsheets would be essential for tracking finances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edwin
2 months ago
I prefer using detailed spreadsheets and feature progress charts for tracking. They offer more flexibility and customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
2 months ago
I agree with Mira. Burn-up charts show work completed and remaining, while integrated master schedules provide a comprehensive view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
2 months ago
I think burn-up charts and integrated master schedules can help track government technology programs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77