Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-DevOps Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-DevOps exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All SAFe-DevOps Questions]

Innovation accounting stresses the importance of avoiding what?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The %C&A metric measures the percent of time downstream customers receive work that is usable as-is in the Continuous Delivery Pipeline. The %C&A metric is a measure of the quality of the work output from a process step. It indicates the percentage of time that the downstream customers receive work that is acceptable as is, without any rework or errors. To calculate the %C&A metric, the people responsible for the next step need to inspect the work output from the previous step and determine whether it meets the quality standards and expectations. They also need to provide feedback to the previous step on the defects or issues they find and how they affect the value stream. By measuring the %C&A metric, the enterprise can gain insight into the current state of the delivery process, such as the lead time, cycle time, throughput, quality, and waste. This insight can help the enterprise identify bottlenecks, dependencies, handoffs, delays, and inefficiencies that affect the flow of value. The %C&A metric can also help the enterprise understand how the flow of value can be improved by applying the principles and practices of DevOps, such as culture, automation, lean flow, measurement, and recovery.By improving the %C&A metric, the enterprise can increase customer satisfaction, reduce costs, accelerate time-to-market, and enhance business agility


by Tiffiny at Jan 22, 2025, 02:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-DevOps Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marilynn
23 hours ago
Definitely C. Vanity metrics. We don't want to get caught up in those meaningless numbers, do we?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
7 days ago
Avoiding quantitative metrics? Isn't that the whole point of innovation accounting? I'm confused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
10 days ago
I'm going to go with C. Vanity metrics. Gotta keep an eye on those flashy numbers that don't really tell the whole story.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
11 days ago
Vanity metrics? Sounds like a fancy way to say 'looking good on paper but not actually useful'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
21 days ago
D) Objective metrics are the way to go for accurate measurement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
22 days ago
I agree with Alyce, vanity metrics can be misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
25 days ago
C) Vanity metrics are to be avoided.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77