Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-APM Topic 6 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-APM exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 6
[All SAFe-APM Questions]

When dealing with a complex product, what is best defined as a secondary persona?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Junita
27 days ago
I'm gonna go with B. Anything else would be like trying to please everyone, and we all know how that ends up. Gotta keep the main thing the main thing, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
30 days ago
C is the answer, no doubt. You can't just ignore the secondary persona - their experience needs to be taken into account, even if it's not the top priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. These options are really getting to the heart of persona-based design. I'll have to think about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Mariko
6 days ago
D) A persona that must be satisfied for the product such that the goals should drive the design process
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
9 days ago
C) The consumer whose experience is essential to the degree that it is acceptable to alter the product experience of the primary persona
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
14 days ago
A) Another user of the primary interface can be accommodated as long as the targeted persona's experience is not compromised
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyman
2 months ago
D seems like the best choice to me. The secondary persona's goals should drive the design process, even if they're not the main focus.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
24 days ago
D) A persona that must be satisfied for the product such that the goals should drive the design process
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
1 months ago
C) The consumer whose experience is essential to the degree that it is acceptable to alter the product experience of the primary persona
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
A) Another user of the primary interface can be accommodated as long as the targeted persona's experience is not compromised
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earlean
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think C is more important for altering the product experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D because their goals should drive the design process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 months ago
I think the best defined secondary persona is C, because their experience is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. A secondary persona is someone the product is explicitly not going to satisfy, so the focus remains on the primary persona's experience.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
29 days ago
I see your point. D also makes sense, as satisfying the secondary persona can drive the design process for the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
1 months ago
I agree with C. It's important to consider the secondary persona's experience if it enhances the primary persona's interaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 months ago
I believe C is more accurate. The secondary persona's experience can be altered if it benefits the primary persona.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77