Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAS Exam A00-260 Topic 2 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAS's A00-260 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 2
[All A00-260 Questions]

In the following display, can status handling be enabled for both the Extract transformation and the Sort transformation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Reita
1 months ago
I'm going with option A. It makes the most sense logically, and I can see how the Return Code Check transformation could be used to manage the status of both transformations.
upvoted 0 times
Chi
1 days ago
I agree, option A seems like the most practical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jose
2 months ago
Haha, the job properties window? Really? That's like trying to find a needle in a haystack. Option D is clearly not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Loren
22 days ago
B) No. Both the Extract and the Sort transformations do not have a Status Handling tab in their corresponding properties window, therefore it is not possible to establish status handling for these transformations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
23 days ago
A) Yes. The Return Code Check transformation can be added to the job flow immediately following the Sort transformation - the Status Handling tab in this Return Code Check transformation properties can then establish the desired status handling for both the Extract and Sort transformations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
24 days ago
B) No. Both the Extract and the Sort transformations do not have a Status Handling tab in their corresponding properties window, therefore it is not possible to establish status handling for these transformations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
1 months ago
A) Yes. The Return Code Check transformation can be added to the job flow immediately following the Sort transformation - the Status Handling tab in this Return Code Check transformation properties can then establish the desired status handling for both the Extract and Sort transformations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerardo
2 months ago
Option B doesn't seem right. The transformations must have a way to handle status, even if it's not obvious at first glance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option C also sounds plausible. Adding Return Code Check transformation twice could work as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
2 months ago
I agree with Raylene. Adding Return Code Check transformation seems like the way to go for enabling status handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer here. Adding the Return Code Check transformation after both the Extract and Sort transformations is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Evette
20 days ago
Absolutely, setting up status handling properly ensures smooth flow of the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
21 days ago
It's important to make sure you set up the status handling correctly for each transformation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
1 months ago
I agree, having the Return Code Check transformation after both transformations is the best way to handle status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Adding the Return Code Check transformation after both Extract and Sort will allow you to establish the desired status handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raylene
3 months ago
I think the answer is A. The Return Code Check transformation can be added to establish status handling for both Extract and Sort.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77