Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAS Exam A00-260 Topic 13 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAS's A00-260 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 13
[All A00-260 Questions]

When using the Table Loader transformation to load an existing target table that contains one or more indexes in SAS Data Integration Studio, which statement is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jolene
2 months ago
I once accidentally removed all the indexes on a production table. Took me weeks to fix that mess. D is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
9 days ago
It's definitely a relief to know that there are options to choose whether to remove or preserve the indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 months ago
I learned my lesson the hard way, never again will I forget to preserve the indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
1 months ago
I always make sure to double check my options before running the Table Loader transformation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
2 months ago
Ha! Removing the indexes and then having to re-create them? What a pain! I'm going with D for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Quinn
1 days ago
D is definitely the way to go to manage indexes effectively in the Table Loader transformation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 days ago
I always choose D when dealing with indexes in SAS Data Integration Studio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
8 days ago
I think D is the most efficient choice when using the Table Loader transformation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 months ago
I agree, it can be a pain to have to re-create indexes. D seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katheryn
2 months ago
B is tempting, but I'm not sure I trust that the indexes will be automatically preserved. I think D is the safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
Vonda
20 days ago
User1: It's always better to be safe than sorry when it comes to preserving indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
24 days ago
User3: I always prefer to have more control over the process, so D makes sense to me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 months ago
I think so too, let's go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
1 months ago
I agree, D seems like the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, I think it's better to have control over whether the indexes are removed or preserved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
User1: I agree, D seems like the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A is also a possibility. Indexes might need to be re-created after the Table Loader executes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the best choice here. I want to preserve my indexes, but also have the flexibility to re-create them if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
2 months ago
I agree with Mira, D seems like the most flexible option for handling indexes during the loading process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
2 months ago
I think the answer is D, because you can choose whether to remove or preserve indexes in the Table Loader.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77