Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_TS452_2022 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS452_2022 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All C_TS452_2022 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Corinne
9 days ago
Good point. Option A seems like a necessary first step, to assign the partner schemas to the relevant arrangement types. Then we can move on to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
11 days ago
I'm not sure if any of these options are completely right. Shouldn't we also need to define the partner schemas first before assigning them to account groups or document types?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
12 days ago
Haha, 'partner role detarmraton'? I think the exam writer needs to brush up on their spelling and terminology. But I agree, option C sounds the most reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
13 days ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Defining the permissible partner roles per account group seems like a logical prerequisite to enable partner role assignment in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
15 days ago
Yeah, I agree. The wording of the question is a bit confusing, but I think it's asking about the necessary steps to enable partner roles in a purchasing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
16 days ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I'm not entirely sure what 'partner role detarmraton' means, but based on the answer options, it seems to be related to setting up partner roles in a purchasing system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77