SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam

Question #: 10
Topic #: 1

Your client wants to ensure that planners justify their decision to NOT give an employee a merit increase.What is the best way to accomplish this?

AQ Use custom validations with the formula if(merit>0.'FALSE .'TRUE

BUnder Define Standard Validation Rules add a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'no-raise '

CEdit the XML and add a comp-force-comment-config tag with the mode attribute set to 'guideline '

DUnder Define Standard Validation Rules add a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'raise '

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Candida at Apr 12, 2024, 03:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ronny

9 days ago

I don't know, man. I kind of like the XML editing option. It feels a little more elegant, you know? Plus, it gives us a bit more control over the process. But I can see the appeal of the 'no-raise' option too. It's a tough call, for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

11 days ago

Haha, you guys are really overthinking this, aren't you? I say we just go with the 'no-raise' option and call it a day. That way, the planner has to explain themselves, and we don't have to worry about any fancy XML editing or custom validations. Keep it simple, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

12 days ago

You know, I was actually thinking about the 'raise' option under the Force Comment Rule. I mean, if the mode is set to 'raise', then the planner has to explain why they're giving the raise, which is kind of the opposite of what we're going for here. But I guess it could work if we're just trying to get them to document their decisions, regardless of the outcome.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

13 days ago

Hmm, I don't know, guys. I was thinking that we could edit the XML and add a comp-force-comment-config tag with the mode attribute set to 'guideline'. That way, it's like a gentle nudge for the planner to explain their decision, rather than a hard-line requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

15 days ago

I'm not so sure about that, dude. I think the better way to go is to add a Force Comment Rule under Define Standard Validation Rules, with the mode set to 'no-raise'. That way, the planner has to leave a comment explaining why they're not giving the raise, and it's a bit more user-friendly than the custom validation thing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

16 days ago

This question is pretty straightforward, but it's also a bit tricky. We need to make sure that the planners justify their decision not to give an employee a merit increase, right? I think the best way to do that is to use a custom validation with the formula if(merit>0,'FALSE','TRUE). That way, the planner has to explicitly say why they're not giving the merit increase.

upvoted 0 times

...