Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_SAPEA_2023 Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

As an Enterprise Architect, you must ensure that future extensions to the Digital Core of the enterprise guarantee stable and reliable operations. The architecture guideline demands to follow the clean-core strategy. What does this demand ensure and entail?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hyun
10 months ago
Side-by-side extensibility all the way! No need to mess with the core when you can build on top of it cleanly. Option C gets my vote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
10 months ago
I see the benefits of option B, direct access to SAP tables can be efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
10 months ago
Ha! Direct table access? That's a recipe for disaster. Option C is the way to go - keep those extensions separate and follow the SAP guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
10 months ago
I prefer option C, keeping extensions separate seems more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
10 months ago
Option A sounds like the winner to me. Keeping those interfaces well-defined and upgrade-stable is crucial for future-proofing the system.
upvoted 1 times
...
Kaitlyn
10 months ago
I agree, option A ensures stability during upgrades.
upvoted 1 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
The clean-core strategy is the way to go. Extensions that don't break upgrades and vice versa - that's what I'm looking for in a robust architecture!
upvoted 0 times
Celestine
10 months ago
C) Extensions are kept strictly separate from the SAP application, Extensions are developed in accordance with the SAP Application Extension Methodology. Side-by-side extensibility options are always preferable to on-stack extensibility options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
10 months ago
A) Extensions do not break an upgrade, and upgrades do not break an extension. Such extensions can access SAP business objects only through well defined, upgrade-stable interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
10 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suresh
10 months ago
Hi Experts, Answer should be option A right? Extensions do not break an upgrade, and upgrades do not break an extension. Such extensions can access SAP business objects only through well defined, upgrade-stable interfaces. But practice shows B as correct answer please advise. Thanks,
upvoted 1 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77