I'm feeling confident with B and D. Streamlining the data structure and combining the runs? Sounds like SAP is finally catching up to the 21st century. Although, I heard the developers celebrated with a LAN party after nailing down these new features. Explains the 'simplified' part, I suppose.
I'm not sure about the reduced number of steps, but I think actual costing in SAP S/4HANA includes selection of activity prices of other CO-versions in the standard run.
A and D look good to me. Anything that helps me avoid the standard run is a plus. I mean, who needs 'activity prices of other CO-versions' anyway? Sounds like a whole lot of unnecessary complexity.
I'm going with B and D. Reducing table structures and combining runs sounds like a recipe for efficiency. Although, I heard the SAP team had a bake-off to decide on the new features. Probably explains the 'simplified' part.
Simona
8 months agoSherita
8 months agoCarli
8 months agoGayla
8 months agoAlishia
8 months agoEden
9 months agoGolda
9 months agoSherell
9 months agoMose
9 months agoCorinne
8 months agoJaleesa
8 months agoKatina
9 months agoTresa
9 months agoFernanda
9 months agoOna
9 months agoDean
8 months agoBeatriz
9 months agoShenika
9 months agoWalker
10 months agoJamal
9 months agoJamal
9 months agoLili
10 months ago