Chat now
Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_BTPA_2408 Topic 1 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_BTPA_2408 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 1
[All P_BTPA_2408 Questions]

As a solution architect, you are in a meeting about the design of a new application to manage the delivery process of goods or services. The extension will be maintained by the line of business (as opposed to IT).

The following application parameters/features are discussed:

* Tracking deliveries in real-time

* Optimizing delivery routes

* Providing delivery notifications to customers.

* Scaling according to usage

* Maintenance downtime must be short.

Which extension type is best suited for this application?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tasia
4 days ago
I'm just hoping none of the options involve a hamster wheel powering the whole system. That might be 'scaling according to usage,' but I don't think it would hold up too well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
9 days ago
Side-by-side all the way! If I had a delivery truck, I'd name it 'Side-by-Side Sally' and paint it bright pink. That'd really optimize the routes, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
12 days ago
The Side-by-side extension seems like the way to go. It's designed for scenarios just like this, where the business needs to take the lead on maintenance and updates. I can't imagine the Classic approach being nimble enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
17 days ago
I'm not sure the Key user extension would be the best fit here. Maintaining downtime is crucial, and Key user extensions can be more complex to manage and update. I'd lean towards the Side-by-side option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
24 days ago
Based on the requirements for real-time tracking, optimizing delivery routes, and scaling, I think the best option is the Side-by-side extension type. This allows for more flexibility and customization compared to the Classic approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 months ago
I disagree. I think Key user would be better as it allows for customization by the line of business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 months ago
I agree with Nikita. Side-by-side allows for new features to be added without affecting the existing system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 months ago
I think the best extension type for this application is Side-by-side.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a