Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_WZADM_01 Topic 6 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_WZADM_01 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 6
[All C_WZADM_01 Questions]

Which of the following scenarios is NOT an option for content package versioning?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is C. Automated deployment from SAP Business Application Studio into the SAP BTP subaccount HTMLS application section.

Launchpad shell plugins are typically developed in SAP Business Application Studio (formerly known as SAP Web IDE Full-Stack) using SAPUI5 or Fiori elements. Once the plugin is developed, it needs to be deployed to SAP Build Work Zone, which is a cloud-based tool for creating and prototyping Fiori apps.

To deploy a Launchpad shell plugin to SAP Build Work Zone, the recommended approach is to use the automated deployment feature in SAP Business Application Studio. This involves configuring the deployment settings in the project's deployment configuration file and then using the Deploy to SAP BTP command in the IDE to deploy the plugin directly to the SAP BTP subaccount HTMLS application section, which is the target environment for SAP Build Work Zone.

Directly uploading the plugin to the DWS administration console (option D) is not a recommended approach since it does not leverage the benefits of automated deployment and may require manual configuration steps. Uploading the plugin to the HTMLS application section without using the automated deployment feature (option B) may also be possible, but it is not the recommended approach since it may require additional manual configuration steps.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gerald
16 hours ago
Automatic updates for all versions? What is this, the Matrix?!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 days ago
Automatic updates for patch versions? Sign me up! That's definitely the option I'm choosing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
6 days ago
Hmm, I feel like option D is the way to go. Manual updates for minor versions make the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
10 days ago
Manual updates for all versions? That's a lot of work! I'm going to go with option B, it seems the most practical.
upvoted 0 times
Stefany
2 days ago
Option B seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
13 days ago
I'm pretty sure option C is not an option for content package versioning. Automatic updates for all versions would be a nightmare to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
18 days ago
Hmm, that makes sense. It's important to have control over minor updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
20 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Manual update only for minor versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
21 days ago
I think the answer is B) Manual update for all versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
24 days ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to have control over minor versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
25 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Manual update only for minor versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
1 months ago
I think the answer is B) Manual update for all versions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77