SAP Exam C_TS4FI_2021 Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS4FI_2021 exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 5

[All C_TS4FI_2021 Questions]

You 'd like to set up low values asset (LVA) management.

What do you need to do?

ADefine two separate asset classes to manage LVA using individual or collective management

BSpecify the minimum amount for LVA at three levels: company code, depreciation area and asset class

CSpecify the minimum amount for LVA at two levels: company code and chart of depreciation

DDefine a base unit for measure for LVA in individual management

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

by Cristen at Dec 10, 2024, 04:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS4FI_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shannon

2 months ago

I'm gonna go with B. Seems like the most comprehensive approach to managing those pesky LVAs. Now, where's the cafeteria? I'm starving!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

2 months ago

B for sure! Gotta cover all the bases when it comes to those low-value assets, am I right? *winks*

upvoted 0 times

Becky

23 days ago

Agreed! It's important to have a clear structure in place for managing low-value assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

27 days ago

Definitely! Specifying the minimum amount for LVA at three levels is crucial for proper management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

29 days ago

B for sure! Gotta cover all the bases when it comes to those low-value assets, am I right? *winks*

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. I'll have to really think this through. Maybe I'll just go with my gut and choose B.

upvoted 0 times

Miriam

23 days ago

User 3: I agree, it provides more detailed control over the LVA management process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanton

1 months ago

User 2: Yeah, specifying the minimum amount at three levels seems like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annelle

1 months ago

User 1: I think B is the way to go for setting up LVA management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

2 months ago

D seems like the easiest option, but I'm not sure if that's specific enough for LVA management. I'll go with B to be on the safe side.

upvoted 0 times

Raul

1 months ago

User 4: Yeah, I think specifying the minimum amount at three levels is important for accurate management of LVAs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deangelo

2 months ago

User 3: B sounds like a good choice to ensure specific requirements for LVA management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

2 months ago

User 2: I agree, but I'm going with B just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carla

2 months ago

User 1: I think D is the easiest option for setting up LVA management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Otis

2 months ago

But specifying the minimum amount at three levels seems like a good idea too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

3 months ago

I agree with Lanie, it would help in managing LVA more efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lanie

3 months ago

I think we should define two separate asset classes for LVA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Davida

3 months ago

I think the correct answer is B. Specifying the minimum amount for LVA at three levels makes the most sense to properly manage these assets.

upvoted 0 times

Eura

1 months ago

That could work too, but I think having the minimum amount specified at three levels provides more clarity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earlean

1 months ago

I would go with option A, defining two separate asset classes seems like a good approach for LVA management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

2 months ago

I agree, it's important to have that level of detail in place for effective management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

2 months ago

I think the correct answer is B. Specifying the minimum amount for LVA at three levels makes the most sense to properly manage these assets.

upvoted 0 times

...