Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_TS452_2022 Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS452_2022 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 4
[All C_TS452_2022 Questions]

What options are available for charts when analyzing a key performance indicator (KPI) report in Purchasing Analytics?

Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To enable partner role determination in purchasing, you must assign a partner schema to relevant document types. A partner schema is a configuration that defines the possible partner roles and functions for a purchasing document such as purchase requisition, purchase order, contract, or scheduling agreement. You can assign a partner schema to a document type in Customizing under Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Partner Determination -> Assign Partner Schemas to Document Types. Reference:SAP S/4HANA Sourcing and Procurement | SAP Learning, Course S4520, Unit 3, Lesson 2.


by Ilda at Dec 10, 2024, 05:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS452_2022 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Nobuko
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through logically. I'm going to have to go with option C. It's the only one that really makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Magda
4 months ago
True, all these activities are necessary for partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
4 months ago
Assigning a partner schema to relevant account groups is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
5 months ago
I agree, defining permissible partner roles per account group seems like the right step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I think option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
6 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick option C. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Essie
5 months ago
User 3: I'm going with D) Define permissible partner roles per document type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
5 months ago
User 2: I'm not sure about that. I believe it's C) Define permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
5 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mona
6 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of partner role determination. I'm going with option A, because assigning partner schemas is the foundation, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Paola
5 months ago
So, we're all in agreement that option A is the prerequisite for partner role determination?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
5 months ago
Definitely, it's the first step to enable partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
5 months ago
I agree, assigning partner schemas is crucial for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
5 months ago
True, setting up partner roles correctly is key for smooth purchasing processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
5 months ago
I think option C is important too, defining permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
6 months ago
I agree, assigning partner schemas is crucial for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
6 months ago
I think option A is the way to go, it sets the groundwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ona
6 months ago
I think both A and C could be correct, as they both play a role in enabling partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
7 months ago
But assigning a partner schema to relevant arrangement types seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
7 months ago
Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm going with option B, just to keep things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
6 months ago
I believe option C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
6 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joana
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Define permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
7 months ago
I think the answer is A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
7 months ago
Option D sounds good to me. Defining the partner roles per document type makes sense as a prerequisite for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
7 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Defining the permissible partner roles per account group seems like the logical prerequisite to enable partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
Fletcher
6 months ago
Assigning a partner schema to relevant arrangement types is necessary for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
6 months ago
Actually, I believe it's option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
6 months ago
I think you're right, option C does seem like the logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
6 months ago
Defining the permissible partner roles per account group seems like the logical prerequisite to enable partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
7 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
7 months ago
No, I'm pretty sure it's option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
7 months ago
I believe it's actually option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
7 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77