Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_TS422_2021 Topic 10 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS422_2021 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 10
[All C_TS422_2021 Questions]

Which options do you have to plan both quant ties and capacities during line loading in repetitive manufacturing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jose
26 days ago
I wonder if the exam writers are trying to trick us with these options. Maybe they're all wrong and the real answer is to just wing it and see what happens. 'Cause that's how I plan my life, anyway.
upvoted 0 times
Margot
3 days ago
A) Run MRP with quota arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alisha
1 months ago
Wait, is MRP even a thing anymore? I thought we were all about lean manufacturing these days. But hey, if it works, it works, right?
upvoted 0 times
Cortney
10 days ago
C) Assign planned orders manually in the planning table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
16 days ago
B) Run MRP with automatic selection of production version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
22 days ago
A) Run MRP with quota arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashley
1 months ago
Hmm, manual planning in option C sounds like a lot of work. I'd rather let the system handle it automatically if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
1 months ago
Option B seems interesting, but I'm not sure if automatic selection of production version is enough to plan both quantities and capacities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
2 months ago
I believe option D is the most suitable for line loading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
2 months ago
I prefer option B because it's more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. PP/DS heuristics are specifically designed for repetitive manufacturing processes.
upvoted 0 times
Jules
16 days ago
I think option A could also be useful for planning quantities in line loading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
18 days ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice for planning capacities in repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
21 days ago
I think option A could also be useful for planning quantities in line loading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
22 days ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice for planning capacities in repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
2 months ago
I believe option D is the most suitable for line loading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
I prefer option B because it's more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a