SAP Exam C_THR86_2405 Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2405 exam

Question #: 4
Topic #: 4

Your customer has two pay components, with IDs SALARY_US and SALARY_UK. that are used for employees' base salary in their respective countries They want to plan for all employees on a single worksheet using the employees' periodic salary NOT the annual value.What is the best way to accomplish this?

ACreate two custom columns and map each to the pay components Use a third custom column to display whichever is non zero

BCreate two different templates and use eligibility rules to ensure employees appear on the correct one

CCreate a pay component group that includes both pay components and use that for the planning

DEnsure the Used for Comp Planning flag of the pay components is set to Comp and do NOT map to a specific pay component ID in the worksheet

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Linette at Aug 29, 2024, 02:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2405 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rocco

9 months ago

I'm with Theron on this one - if the customer wanted to manage two separate templates, they probably would have said so upfront!

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

9 months ago

Option A seems a bit clunky to me. Why introduce more custom columns when you can just use a pay component group?

upvoted 0 times

Mona

8 months ago

Option A may seem clunky, but it gives more flexibility in displaying the non-zero value

upvoted 0 times

...

Bev

8 months ago

C) Create a pay component group that includes both pay components and use that for the planning

upvoted 0 times

...

Annette

9 months ago

A) Create two custom columns and map each to the pay components Use a third custom column to display whichever is non zero

upvoted 0 times

...

Theron

9 months ago

Haha, I bet the customer is really hoping the answer isn't 'create two templates' - talk about a maintenance nightmare!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

9 months ago

I'd go with Option D. Not mapping to specific pay component IDs gives you more flexibility down the line.

upvoted 0 times

Ira

9 months ago

I agree, Option D seems like the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

9 months ago

Option D is definitely the way to go. It gives you more flexibility for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sage

9 months ago

I think option D is the most efficient, setting the Used for Comp Planning flag and not mapping to a specific pay component ID.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghann

10 months ago

Option C looks like the most straightforward approach. Combining the pay components into a single group simplifies the planning process.

upvoted 0 times

Alline

9 months ago

I agree, using a pay component group makes it easier to manage and track the salary components for employees in different countries.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

9 months ago

Option C looks like the most straightforward approach. Combining the pay components into a single group simplifies the planning process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

10 months ago

But wouldn't it be easier to just use a third custom column to display whichever is non zero?

upvoted 0 times

...

Velda

10 months ago

I disagree, I believe creating two custom columns and mapping each to the pay components is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

10 months ago

I think the best way is to create a pay component group that includes both pay components.

upvoted 0 times

...