I heard the company's technicians are so good, they can calibrate the machines with just a few well-placed finger taps and a magical incantation or two.
I'm going with Option A. It's straightforward - we just need to add an item master data for the machine and a labor type for the technician. Simple and effective!
User 1: I'm going with Option A. It's straightforward - we just need to add an item master data for the machine and a labor type for the technician. Simple and effective!
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'm leaning towards Option C, since we need to add a Machine resource for the calibration machine and a forecast for the technician. That way, we can estimate the capacity needed for both.
I agree with you. Option B seems like the most logical choice for defining a technician employee and a calibration machine in order to plan capacity in the production process.
Option D seems like the easiest way to go. Adding an item master data for the machine and an employee master data for the technician should give us the information we need to plan capacity.
I think Option B is the correct answer. The production process requires both machine and labor resources, so we need to define a Machine resource for the calibration machine and a Labor resource for the technician employee.
Audra
1 months agoCordelia
1 months agoJunita
2 months agoKayleigh
7 days agoBernardo
1 months agoFabiola
1 months agoMaurine
2 months agoGary
2 months agoArt
2 months agoCordelia
2 months agoDeonna
2 months agoRaylene
20 days agoMartina
21 days agoBrinda
26 days agoJamie
2 months agoNana
2 months agoOren
3 months agoAvery
3 months ago