SAP Exam C_S4FCF_2021 Topic 10 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_S4FCF_2021 exam

Question #: 58
Topic #: 10

[All C_S4FCF_2021 Questions]

A customer has a non-SAP source system with runtime-database license. Which SLT scenario must be used for Central Finance implementation?

AApplication-based replication

BNon-SAP

CBusiness integration

DData-based replication

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Kasandra at Dec 11, 2024, 01:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_S4FCF_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Noel

6 months ago

D for 'Dynpro', am I right? That's the only option that doesn't sound like a financial instrument.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

6 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I thought MDG stood for 'Master Data Gummy Bears'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clarence

6 months ago

This is a tough one, but I think I'll go with A. Cost Object mapping just sounds so... masterful, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Azalee

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards C. Central Finance seems like the perfect place to keep all my value mappings in one place.

upvoted 0 times

Lynna

5 months ago

Have you tried using B) SAP GUI transaction for value mapping?

upvoted 0 times

...

Peter

5 months ago

I agree with you, C) Central Finance instance seems like a good option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

5 months ago

I prefer D) WebDynpro application for maintaining value mapping.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

5 months ago

I think A) Cost Object mapping might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiann

6 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is B. I mean, what could be more 'master data' than the good old SAP GUI?

upvoted 0 times

Izetta

5 months ago

I agree with you, B) SAP GUI transaction is the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

5 months ago

I believe it's D) WebDynpro application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abraham

5 months ago

I think it's A) Cost Object mapping.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latia

6 months ago

Option D sounds like the way to go. Who doesn't love a good WebDynpro app?

upvoted 0 times

Amos

5 months ago

I've used WebDynpro apps before, they are definitely a great choice for this task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edward

5 months ago

I think using a WebDynpro application would make maintaining value mapping much easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dona

5 months ago

I agree, WebDynpro applications are user-friendly and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bonita

6 months ago

I believe it's D) WebDynpro application because it allows for maintaining value mapping one by one efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

7 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think A) Cost Object mapping could also be a possible answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

7 months ago

I agree with Carman, WebDynpro application makes sense for maintaining value mapping.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

7 months ago

I think the answer is D) WebDynpro application.

upvoted 0 times

...