Hmm, I was leaning towards D. The whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked. That seems like the safest option to me, even if it's a bit overkill.
I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked. This makes sense to me as a way to minimize the impact of the change.
I'm not sure about that. I think the whole hierarchy of the node being changed should be locked to ensure consistency in the changes made. So, I would go with option D.
I agree with Catherin. It makes sense that only the elements directly related to the node being changed are locked, allowing for more flexibility in making adjustments.
Tracey
2 days agoShizue
10 days agoGearldine
28 days agoKattie
1 months agoCatherin
1 months ago