Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_MDG_1909 Topic 10 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_MDG_1909 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 10
[All C_MDG_1909 Questions]

What is the benefit of loose interlocking for hierarchies withinthe same change request? Choose the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tracey
2 days ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards D. The whole hierarchy of the node being changed is locked. That seems like the safest option to me, even if it's a bit overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
10 days ago
I think the correct answer is B. Only nodes directly below the parent node of the node being changed are locked. This makes sense to me as a way to minimize the impact of the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
28 days ago
I'm not sure about that. I think the whole hierarchy of the node being changed should be locked to ensure consistency in the changes made. So, I would go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 months ago
I agree with Catherin. It makes sense that only the elements directly related to the node being changed are locked, allowing for more flexibility in making adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
1 months ago
I think the benefit of loose interlocking is that only the elements assigned to the hierarchy of the node being changed are locked.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77