Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_HCMP_2311 Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HCMP_2311 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All C_HCMP_2311 Questions]

When processing a wage type, there is no requirement to differentiate between employee subgroup groupings. What value must you add in parameter 3 when function PIT calls the rule to process the wage type?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Merissa
1 months ago
If there's no requirement to differentiate, then why do we even have employee subgroups? This whole thing sounds like a ploy to make us question our very existence. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick option A, GEN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
1 months ago
Ah, the classic 'leave it blank' option. That's the kind of thinking that gets you a promotion in this industry. Option D for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Osvaldo
9 days ago
I agree, option D is always a safe bet in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
13 days ago
I always go for the 'leave it blank' option, it's never failed me before.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonzo
1 months ago
This question is like a riddle wrapped in an enigma. I'm going to go with option B, Pnn, because it sounds like it could be a secret code or something.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
5 days ago
I agree with you, option B, Pnn, does sound like a secret code. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
8 days ago
I'm not sure about this one. Maybe option A, GEN, is a safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
23 days ago
I think option B, Pnn, is the right choice. It does sound mysterious.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annelle
2 months ago
Hmm, 'no requirement to differentiate'? That sounds a bit too good to be true. I'll go with option C, NOAB, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Penney
9 days ago
I'm leaning towards option B, Pnn, as the value to add in parameter 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
17 days ago
I would go with option A, GEN, just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
24 days ago
I agree, it's better to be cautious in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 months ago
I think option C, NOAB, is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisbeth
2 months ago
Wait, we're supposed to differentiate between employee subgroups? I thought this was a simple wage type processing question. I'm going with option D, let's see if I can outsmart the system!
upvoted 0 times
Farrah
25 days ago
I'm not sure about this one, but I'll go with option C) NOAB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
2 months ago
I think you might be overthinking it. I'm going with option A) GEN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be B) Pnn because it could be related to processing the wage type in a specific way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
2 months ago
I agree with Antonio, because when there is no requirement to differentiate between employee subgroup groupings, the general value should be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) GEN.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77