Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_BYD15_1908 Topic 3 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_BYD15_1908 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 3
[All C_BYD15_1908 Questions]

Which business scenario requires a manual time valuation correction run?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shawn
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) too. Modifying past business configurations seems like the kind of change that would trigger the need for a manual time valuation correction run.
upvoted 0 times
Jesse
2 days ago
C) Add a new time account to the employee's time file in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
12 days ago
I agree, changing past business configurations definitely seems like a scenario that would require a manual time valuation correction run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
16 days ago
B) Change the business configuration for time accounts, or premium pay, to a date in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
18 days ago
A) Transfer the employee to a new organizational unit with a transfer date that is in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jovita
2 months ago
Haha, imagine trying to add a new time account to an employee's file in the past. That would be a real time travel situation! I'd go with B) as the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
Sherill
12 days ago
I think assigning a new work schedule in the past would cause a lot of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
27 days ago
Definitely, transferring an employee to a new unit in the past would be a mess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 months ago
I agree, changing the business configuration for time accounts seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
1 months ago
Yeah, adding a new time account in the past sounds like a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D, assigning a new work schedule to an employee's time file in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
2 months ago
I agree with Ma, because transferring an employee to a new organizational unit in the past would require a manual time valuation correction run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
2 months ago
Hmm, I was considering C) as well, but I agree that B) makes the most sense. Updating past time account details seems like the kind of scenario that would need a manual correction.
upvoted 0 times
Kerrie
1 months ago
Definitely. It's important to ensure accuracy when making changes to past time account details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to make sure the business configuration for time accounts is accurate, even if it's in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
1 months ago
I agree. It seems like the most logical scenario for a manual time valuation correction run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. Updating past time account details would definitely require a manual correction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
1 months ago
I think B) makes the most sense. Updating past time account details seems like the kind of scenario that would need a manual correction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
2 months ago
I think B) Change the business configuration for time accounts, or premium pay, to a date in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margery
2 months ago
I think B) is the correct answer. Changing the business configuration for time accounts or premium pay to a past date would definitely require a manual time valuation correction run.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77