Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 6 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 6
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

Cloud Kicks wantsto represent stages for opportunities within the sales process.

Which Salesforce Lightning Designing System (SLDS) component should be recommended?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To optimize the relationship between two objects in Salesforce, such as Container and Container Bids, where there is a need for a tight relationship and cascading delete functionality, a Master-Detail relationship is most suitable. This type of relationship has the following characteristics:

Cascading Delete: When a record in the master (or parent) object is deleted, all related detail (or child) records are automatically deleted. This ensures data integrity and aligns with the requirement that Container Bids should be deleted when their associated Container is deleted.

Tight Coupling: A Master-Detail relationship creates a strong linkage between the two objects, where the detail (child) record's existence is dependent on the master (parent) record. This is appropriate for scenarios where the child record should not exist without its parent.

Options B (Hierarchical Lookup) and C (Many-to-one Lookup) do not provide the same level of dependency and cascading delete functionality inherent in a Master-Detail relationship.

Reference: Salesforce's official documentation provides extensive information on different types of relationships between objects, including Master-Detail relationships. The Salesforce Developer Documentation is a valuable resource for understanding how to set up and use these relationships to ensure data integrity and optimize application design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Annabelle
15 days ago
I'm not sure, but C) Progress indicator could also work to show the progress in the sales process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
15 days ago
I'm torn between the progress indicator and the path component. Both seem like viable options, but the path component might provide a more visual and engaging experience for the sales team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
16 days ago
The progress indicator seems like the perfect choice to represent the stages in the sales process. It's clean, intuitive, and aligns with the Salesforce Lightning Design System.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
18 days ago
I agree with Felicitas, Path makes sense for representing stages in the sales process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
20 days ago
I think the answer is D) Path.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77