Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 5 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 5
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) has been tracking the details of its storage facilities in an Excel sheet, where each facility is represented as a row and the details about each facility are represented by columns.

How should CK store this information in Salesforce?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best way to store the information of Cloud Kicks' storage facilities in Salesforce is to use objects to represent storage facilities and fields to store facility details.This is because objects and fields in Salesforce are analogous to database tables and columns, respectively1.Each object contains a set of fields that store data values, and each record is an instance of an object1. Therefore, if Cloud Kicks wants to store the same information that they have in their Excel sheet, they can create a custom object called Storage Facility, and add fields for each detail that they want to track, such as location, capacity, inventory, and so on. Then, they can create records for each storage facility and populate the fields with the corresponding data.This way, they can store and manage their data in a structured and consistent way, and leverage the features and benefits of Salesforce, such as reports, dashboards, automation, and security23.

Using objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities is not a valid option, as it does not make sense to use objects as data values.Objects are meant to represent entities or concepts, not attributes or properties1. Using objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details is also not a good option, as it would create unnecessary complexity and redundancy in the data model.Objects can be related to each other through various types of relationships, such as lookup, master-detail, or many-to-many4. However, in this case, there is no need to create a separate object for each facility detail, as they are not independent entities, but rather characteristics of the storage facilities.Creating a separate object for each detail would also require creating more fields, records, and relationships, which would increase the maintenance and storage costs, and reduce the performance and usability of the system5.Reference:

Learn All About Objects and Fields in Salesforce - Forcetalks

Mastering Salesforce CRM Administration - Packt Subscription

Overview of Salesforce Objects and Fields

Object Reference for the Salesforce Platform

Understand Custom & Standard Objects Unit | Salesforce Trailhead


by Jerlene at Nov 15, 2024, 08:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium User Experience Designer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mel
6 months ago
I'm going with Option C. It's the most logical and efficient way to structure the data. Although, I do have to wonder about that company name...
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
4 months ago
That's a valid point. It really depends on how detailed you want the information to be stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
5 months ago
I would go with Option A. It seems more straightforward to have separate objects for facility details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
5 months ago
I agree, it would keep the data organized and easy to access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
I think Option C makes sense. It separates the storage facilities from their details.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabra
6 months ago
Option B is the way to go, but I have to say - 'Cloud Kicks'? Really? Who came up with that name?
upvoted 0 times
Emerson
5 months ago
B) Objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
A) Objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
6 months ago
Option A seems a bit convoluted. Why not just have one object for the whole shebang? Keep it simple, CK!
upvoted 0 times
Blair
5 months ago
User 4: I think Option A could work if CK wants to have more flexibility in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
5 months ago
User 3: Option C might work too, it depends on how detailed the facility details are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
5 months ago
User 2: I agree, having separate objects for each makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
6 months ago
User 1: Option B seems like the best choice. It keeps everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teddy
6 months ago
But wouldn't it be more organized to have separate objects for storage facilities and facility details? (C)
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
6 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go. It's more straightforward to have storage facilities as the main object and facility details as fields.
upvoted 0 times
Marnie
5 months ago
Definitely, having storage facilities as the main object makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
5 months ago
I agree with you, Option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
5 months ago
C) Objects to represent storage facilities and fields to store facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
6 months ago
B) Objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
6 months ago
A) Objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristen
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe CK should use objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details (B)
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
7 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. Having separate objects for storage facilities and facility details allows for better organization and easier data management.
upvoted 0 times
Salley
6 months ago
Option B makes the most sense. Having separate objects for storage facilities and facility details allows for better organization and easier data management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
6 months ago
B) Objects to represent both storage facilities and facility details
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
7 months ago
A) Objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teddy
7 months ago
I think CK should use objects to represent facility details and fields to store storage facilities (A)
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a