Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 5 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam

Question #: 26
Topic #: 5

[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

An architect has a requirement to create a criteria-based sharing rule based on the customer Social Security Number. However, when setting up the rule in Contact Sharing, the field is not shown on the list of available fields.

What is causing this issue?

AThe field has been configured for encryption.

BThe architect's profile docs not have Field Level Security for this field.

CThe architect does not have permission to Compliance fields.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Joesph at Nov 24, 2023, 07:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lorrine

1 months ago

I'm feeling option C. The architect must be running around the office, begging for permission to the Compliance fields. 'Please, sir, may I have some access?'

upvoted 0 times

Hoa

2 days ago

B) The architect's profile does not have Field Level Security for this field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

4 days ago

A) The field has been configured for encryption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reiko

2 months ago

Aha, I reckon it's option B. The architect needs to get their profile updated with the right Field Level Security. Welcome to the world of Salesforce administration!

upvoted 0 times

Brendan

12 days ago

The architect should definitely look into updating their profile for that field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

20 days ago

Yeah, the Field Level Security might be the issue here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

20 days ago

Definitely. The architect needs to make sure they have the right permissions for that field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mi

1 months ago

Yeah, the Field Level Security might be the issue here. They should update it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carri

1 months ago

I think it's option B too. The architect should check their profile settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lakeesha

1 months ago

I think it's option B too. The architect should check their profile settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

2 months ago

Haha, I'm going with option C. The architect probably doesn't have permission to access the compliance fields. Classic case of 'it's not you, it's the permissions'.

upvoted 0 times

Martina

1 days ago

User 4: Yeah, I agree. It's likely a permissions issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

5 days ago

User 3: I'm with Ceola on this one. The architect probably doesn't have permission to Compliance fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hortencia

10 days ago

User 2: Hortencia, I disagree. I believe the architect's profile does not have Field Level Security for this field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxanne

2 months ago

User 1: I think it's because the field has been configured for encryption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barney

2 months ago

I'm betting on option A. If the field is encrypted, that would explain why it's not showing up in the list. Gotta love those security features, right?

upvoted 0 times

...