Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 3
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

An architect from a previous project implemented Platform Shield Encryption for a company. However, based on a recent audit, the company's Privacy Team identified three additional fields in their Account Records (Billing Street, Billing City and Phone) that needs to be secure and protected.

How should an architect proceed with this new policy change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Izetta
1 months ago
Ah, the joys of dealing with data privacy policies. Option C is the way to go, but I bet the Salesforce team is going to have a field day with this one.
upvoted 0 times
Amber
3 days ago
I agree, contacting Salesforce to update the existing records seems like the most efficient way to ensure compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
9 days ago
Option C is definitely the best choice here. It's important to make sure those fields are secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfred
2 months ago
Classic Encryption? What is this, the 90s? Option C is definitely the way forward. Gotta keep that data secure, you know!
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
3 days ago
User 3: Gotta keep that data secure, you know!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
4 days ago
User 2: Matt is right, Option C is definitely the way forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 months ago
User 1: Classic Encryption? What is this, the 90s?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kiley
2 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine the Salesforce support team's reaction to someone reaching out for 'encryption verification'. Option A sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Sue
21 days ago
User 4: Definitely, let's make sure all the necessary fields are secure and protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
27 days ago
User 3: Yeah, using Encryption Policy and reaching out to Salesforce for help sounds like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that seems like the most efficient way to ensure the new fields are encrypted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
2 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option C and contact Salesforce to update the existing records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. The Encryption Policy should take care of encrypting the new fields, and Salesforce will let you know when it's done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
2 months ago
Option C seems like the best approach here. Contacting Salesforce to update the existing records and ensure all the required fields are encrypted is the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
2 months ago
I'm not sure. Shouldn't we use Classic Encryption to ensure all fields are protected?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
2 months ago
I agree with Lashawnda. Contacting Salesforce to update existing records seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
2 months ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77