Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Net Zero Cloud exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions]

What three things are correct about Energy use Records and Carbon Footprint records? (3)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Blondell at Jul 03, 2023, 07:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Margart
1 months ago
Wait, so we have to choose three correct answers? That's a lot of pressure. I'm just going to close my eyes and point at the screen. Hopefully, I land on the right ones!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
1 months ago
Personally, I think option E is a bit too restrictive. Energy use records should be able to handle a variety of time periods, not just monthly. But hey, what do I know? I'm just here to pass the exam.
upvoted 0 times
Ira
1 days ago
I see your point. It would be helpful to have that flexibility in the records for different time periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 days ago
Yeah, I think having the ability to represent different time periods would make the energy use records more versatile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
3 days ago
I agree, option E does seem a bit limiting. It would be more flexible if it could handle different time periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carry
2 months ago
Ha! The 'many-to-many relationship' options (C and D) sound like they were written by someone who's a little too obsessed with database concepts. Let's keep it simple, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Jeannine
1 months ago
E) Energy use records have to represent monthly usage
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
2 months ago
A) Carbon footprint records can be the sum of a single asset for a given year
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
2 months ago
I believe option D is correct because the many-to-many relationship allows for associating multiple assets for any period of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
I disagree with option B because Net Zero Cloud does use energy usage records for carbon calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
Option B sounds suspicious to me. I thought Net Zero Cloud was supposed to handle the carbon calculations automatically, not require the client to create custom records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure that option A is correct. Carbon footprint records should be able to represent the total impact of a single asset over a given year.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
1 months ago
So, options A, C, and E are correct about energy use records and carbon footprint records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 months ago
That's true, option E specifies that energy use records have to represent monthly usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
But option C also mentions that the many-to-many relationship allows the client to create a single asset for multiple years.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
I agree, option A states that carbon footprint records can be the sum of a single asset for a given year.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lindsey
3 months ago
I think option A is correct because carbon footprint records can be calculated for a single asset in a year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
3 months ago
I believe option D is correct. The many-to-many relationship allows clients to associate multiple assets for any period of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
3 months ago
I disagree with option B. Net Zero Cloud should use energy usage records for carbon calculations, not custom records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
3 months ago
I think option A is correct because carbon footprint records can be calculated for a single asset in a year.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77