Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce MuleSoft Developer I Questions]

Refer to the below exhibit.

A Mule application configures a property placeholder file named config.yaml to set some property placeholders for an HTTP connector.

What is the valid properties placeholder file to set these values?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Correct answer is as below as it follows the correct syntax.

http:

basepath: 'api'

host : 'localhost'

port : '8081'

Mule Doc Reference :https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.3/mule-app-properties-to-configure


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leigha
11 months ago
Option A? More like option 'Nah' if you ask me. That's just too basic to be a valid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
11 months ago
Option C is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. It's just not the right format for this configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
10 months ago
C: Option D seems to have the correct structure with the http, basePath, port, and host properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
10 months ago
B: I agree, it looks like it's missing the proper syntax for setting property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
10 months ago
A: Option C is definitely not the right format for this configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
11 months ago
Option D has a bit too much JSON formatting, it's a bit overkill for this simple task. I'd go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Emilio
10 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
10 months ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
10 months ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
11 months ago
I agree, Option B looks simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leana
11 months ago
I agree, Option B seems to be the most complete and organized approach to setting the property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Adaline
11 months ago
Yeah, Option B looks well-structured and clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
11 months ago
I think Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerry
12 months ago
Option B looks more comprehensive and structured. It clearly defines the properties for the HTTP connector.
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
11 months ago
Yes, option B provides a clear layout of the properties for the HTTP connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
11 months ago
I would go with option B for setting the property placeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
11 months ago
Yes, option B seems to be the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
11 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most structured and easy to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
11 months ago
Option B has the basepath, host, and port clearly defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
11 months ago
I agree, option B looks more structured and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
11 months ago
I think option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77