Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Maps Professional Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Maps Professional exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Maps Professional Questions]

A client has configured their data set and alignment in Territory Planning; however, when they open the alignment, they see that no units are assigned to areas despite being assigned in Salesforce. Which two steps should a consultant take to troubleshoot the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Helaine
2 months ago
A and B both sound like good options, but I think B is the way to go. Gotta love these alignment issues, they're like a puzzle you have to solve!
upvoted 0 times
Junita
13 days ago
Hopefully editing the data set and alignment will fix the issue with the units not being assigned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
1 months ago
It's definitely like solving a puzzle, trying to figure out why the units aren't assigned correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
2 months ago
Yeah, changing the matching logic for the Unit Id field might solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
2 months ago
I agree, B seems like the best option to troubleshoot the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
2 months ago
D sounds like it could work, but I'm not sure if editing the records in Salesforce is the best approach. I'd start with B to see if I can fix the alignment first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
2 months ago
C is interesting, but I'm not sure if checking the report queries is necessary here. The issue seems to be with the alignment, not the data set itself.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
1 months ago
D) Edit the data set, and see what field was used for Unit Assignment. Edit the records in Salesforce to match the area names in Territory Planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
1 months ago
A) Edit the data set, and see what field was used for Unit Assignment. Create a new alignment, and use the correct matching logic for this field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Graciela
2 months ago
I believe option A is the best choice. It covers both checking the data set and alignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 months ago
I agree with Toshia. They should also create a new alignment with correct matching logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
2 months ago
I think the consultant should edit the data set and check the field used for Unit Assignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 months ago
B seems like the most logical step to troubleshoot the issue. I'll need to check the field used for Unit Id and make sure the alignment is using the correct matching logic.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
25 days ago
User 4: Editing the records in Salesforce to match the area names could be another solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
29 days ago
User 3: Double checking the reports and queries used to create the data set might also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 months ago
User 2: Yes, and we should also change the matching logic in the alignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should edit the data set and check the field used for Unit Id.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77