Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce-Data-Cloud Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce-Data-Cloud exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce-Data-Cloud Questions]

What are the two distinct phases of data model management in Data Cloud?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The Source Sequence reconciliation rule allows you to sort your data sources in order of most to least preferred for inclusion in a unified profile9. For example, you can specify that data from Marketing Cloud should have higher priority than data from Service Cloud when selecting attributes such as first name or last name.


by Lavelle at May 01, 2024, 11:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce-Data-Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mary
1 years ago
I'm gonna go with Option D. Identifying which records should be merged is the key to effective identity resolution, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Mary
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still believe Option B is the best choice as it prioritizes the most recently updated data source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
11 months ago
I think Option A is also important as it sets the priority of specific data sources when building attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
11 months ago
I agree, Option D is crucial for merging individual records into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Polly
1 years ago
Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure it's the full answer. Prioritizing data sources is important, but it's not the whole picture.
upvoted 0 times
Aliza
12 months ago
Maybe option D is the correct answer since it mentions merging individual records into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
12 months ago
I agree, prioritizing data sources is key, but there's more to it than just that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
1 years ago
I think option A is on the right track, but it might not be the complete answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Esteban
1 years ago
I see where you're coming from. It's definitely between B and D for me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 years ago
B because it’s about prioritizing the most recently updated data source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
1 years ago
Why B? I thought D was more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
1 years ago
Haha, Option C is hilarious! Alphanumerically sequenced data sources? I don't think that's how identity resolution works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
1 years ago
I think Option B is the correct answer. It's all about identifying the most recently updated data source and prioritizing that in the reconciliation process.
upvoted 0 times
Marg
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Setting the priority of specific data sources when building attributes in a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
12 months ago
I think Option D could also be a possibility. Setting a priority for specific data sources to merge records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
1 years ago
I agree, Option B makes sense. It's important to prioritize the most recent data source.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Silvana
1 years ago
Option D makes the most sense to me. It's all about prioritizing data sources to determine which records should be merged into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
12 months ago
Yes, setting a priority for specific data sources helps determine which individual records should be merged into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
12 months ago
I agree, option D is the most logical choice for the Source Sequence reconciliation rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
12 months ago
Yes, setting a priority for specific data sources helps determine which records should be merged into a unified profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
1 years ago
I agree, option D is the most logical choice for the Source Sequence reconciliation rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
1 years ago
Yes, setting a priority for specific data sources is crucial for accurate reconciliation in Identity Resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
1 years ago
I agree, option D is the most logical choice. It helps in merging individual records into a unified profile based on the priority of data sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
1 years ago
Yeah, I think option B makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
1 years ago
It's a bit tricky, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
1 years ago
What do you think about the Source Sequence reconciliation rule question?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77