Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce-Data-Cloud Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce-Data-Cloud exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce-Data-Cloud Questions]

An administrator wants to be able to create a multi-dimensional metric to identify unified individual lifetime value (LTV). Which sequence of DMO joins are necessary within the Calculated Insight to enable this calculation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To create a multi-dimensional metric to identify unified individual lifetime value (LTV), the administrator needs to join the following data model objects (DMOs) in the Calculated Insight:

Unified Individual: This DMO represents the unified profile of an individual, which contains attributes from multiple sources.

Unified Link Individual: This DMO represents the link between an Individual DMO and a Unified Individual DMO.

Sales Order: This DMO represents a transaction or purchase made by an individual.

The sequence of joins should start from the Unified Individual DMO, then join the Unified Link Individual DMO using the UnifiedIndividualId field, and then join the Sales Order DMO using the IndividualId field. This way, the administrator can access the sales order data for each unified individual and calculate their lifetime value.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Laurene
10 months ago
That's a valid point. Maybe D) Sales Order > Individual > Unified Individual could be the correct sequence for the multi-dimensional metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
10 months ago
But if we start with the Unified Individual, wouldn't it be more logical to follow through with Individual before Sales Order?
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
10 months ago
This question is making my head spin. I'm going to go with option B, but I might need a calculator and a crystal ball to figure it out.
upvoted 0 times
Vanna
10 months ago
I think option B makes sense too, let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
10 months ago
I agree, I'm also leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
10 months ago
This question seems complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wayne
11 months ago
I am leaning towards C) Sales Order > Unified Individual. It seems to make more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
11 months ago
I disagree. I believe the correct sequence is B) Unified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
11 months ago
Wait, are we supposed to be able to understand this question? I'm just going to randomly pick an answer and hope for the best. Maybe D, because who doesn't love a good 'Individual > Unified Individual' move?
upvoted 0 times
Ruthann
10 months ago
I'm going with A, Unified Individual > Individual > Sales Order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
10 months ago
I think it's B, Unified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
10 months ago
I'll go with C, Sales Order > Unified Individual seems like a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
10 months ago
I'm going with A, Unified Individual > Individual > Sales Order sounds logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
10 months ago
I think it's B, the Unified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order seems like the right sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
11 months ago
I agree with Francisca. I think the correct sequence should involve linking Unified Individuals first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Unified Individual > Individual > Sales Order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C might be the way to go. Starting with Sales Order and then working up to Unified Individual could work, right?
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
10 months ago
I agree, starting with Sales Order and then moving to Unified Individual seems like the logical sequence to calculate LTV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
11 months ago
I think option C makes sense. Starting with Sales Order and then linking to Unified Individual could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francisca
11 months ago
Well, I think we need to link Unified Individuals before considering Sales Orders to calculate lifetime value accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
12 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Joining Unified Individual, Individual, and Sales Order seems like the logical way to go about this.
upvoted 0 times
Iola
11 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the most logical sequence of joins to calculate the unified individual lifetime value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
11 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Joining Unified Individual, Individual, and Sales Order seems like the logical way to go about this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lawrence
12 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The sequence of DMO joins should start with Unified Individual, then Unified Link Individual, and finally Sales Order to enable the calculation of unified individual lifetime value.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
10 months ago
Yes, that sounds like the right path to follow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
10 months ago
Great, let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
10 months ago
That sequence should enable the calculation of LTV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
Finally, end with Sales Order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
11 months ago
Then move to Unified Link Individual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
11 months ago
I agree, it should start with Unified Individual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
11 months ago
I believe option B is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
12 months ago
Why do you think that? Can you explain your rationale?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B, Unified Individual > Unified Link Individual > Sales Order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
1 years ago
I think the answer is A, Unified Individual > Individual > Sales Order.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77