Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Communications Cloud Topic 2 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Communications Cloud exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions]

The discovery phase has identified the industries order management should integrate with the provisioning system using HTTP protocol, however to activate the service the external system requires two HTTP requests passing formatted JSON payloads. A temporary identifier is returned from the first request and must be used on the second one, but it has no relevance to CRM. The provisioning system is known to reply within 750ms for each request. What are two out of the box options for integration within this system?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Antonio
13 days ago
As a wise man once said, 'Keep it simple, stupid.' I think option B is the way to go here - no need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
20 days ago
I think option B is a good compromise, as it handles both requests and returns the result to order management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
22 days ago
Haha, I'm just imagining the poor developer trying to explain what a 'non-assetizable attribute' is to the team. Option B looks like the safest bet to me.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
8 days ago
Option B looks like the safest bet to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
24 days ago
But option D doesn't specify how the identifier will be used in the second request, which could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
25 days ago
I'm voting for option D. Caching the identifier in memory seems risky, and I like the idea of saving it in a non-assetizable attribute for future reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
26 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it ensures the identifier is saved for future use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
1 months ago
Option C with Data Raptor sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit here since the requirements don't mention the need for any additional data processing.
upvoted 0 times
Elly
6 days ago
A) Design for one callout each request and cache the identifier in memory
upvoted 0 times
...
...
My
1 months ago
Both options B and D seem viable, but I'm leaning towards B since it ensures the complete integration process is handled within the system.
upvoted 0 times
Donte
5 days ago
Let's go with option B then, it seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
9 days ago
I agree, having the integration procedure handle both requests makes it more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
20 days ago
I think option B is the best choice for this integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it's efficient and reduces the number of callouts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77