Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Administrator Topic 5 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Administrator exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Administrator Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters uses a custom object Invoice to collect customer payment

information from an external billing system. The Billing System field needs to be filled on every

Invoice record.

How should an administrator ensure this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mariann
1 months ago
Forget the exam, I'm just here for the witty banter. Anyone else feel like this question is about as exciting as watching paint dry?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
2 months ago
Option D makes the most sense to me. Requiring the field on the record type is a nice balance between flexibility and ensuring the requirement is met.
upvoted 0 times
Brock
1 days ago
User 3: Yeah, requiring it on the record type makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
2 days ago
User 2: I agree, it seems like a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
5 days ago
User 1: I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgiana
2 months ago
Hah, Option C is just overkill for a simple field requirement. Do we really need an approval process just to fill in a Billing System field?
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
17 days ago
User 3: User Comment: Hah, Option C is just overkill for a simple field requirement. Do we really need an approval process just to fill in a Billing System field?
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
19 days ago
User 2: B) Create a Process Builder to set the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
1 months ago
User 1: A) Make the field universally required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Germaine
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B - a Process Builder to set the field. That way, we can automate the requirement without making the field mandatory on all records.
upvoted 0 times
Leah
3 days ago
User4: That sounds like a good compromise, User3. It automates the requirement without making it mandatory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
4 days ago
User3: I prefer Option B, using a Process Builder to automate setting the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
17 days ago
User2: I agree with User1, it's important to ensure the field is always filled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
1 months ago
User1: I think Option A is the way to go, making the field universally required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
2 months ago
Option A seems the most straightforward way to ensure the field is filled. But is it the best approach if there are valid scenarios where the field may not be needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
2 months ago
I think creating a Process Builder could also work to set the field automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
2 months ago
I agree with Kiley, that way we ensure the requirement is always met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
2 months ago
I think the best option is to make the field universally required.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77