Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Platform App Builder Topic 3 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Platform App Builder exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 3
[All Platform App Builder Questions]

An app builder wants to limit the number of fields users are required to fill out when creating a new Opportunity. Once they fill out the required fields and save, the full record page with additional fields relevant to the Opportunity type becomes available.

How could this be accomplished?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Levi
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Hiding the extra fields is the most user-friendly approach. Who wants to fill out a million fields just to create a new Opportunity?
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
2 days ago
I agree, it can be overwhelming to see too many fields at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
20 days ago
Option D is the way to go. Hiding the extra fields is the most user-friendly approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
1 months ago
Haha, Option A is like, 'Hey, let's just automatically fill in the Opportunity type! What could possibly go wrong?' Classic Salesforce shenanigans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 months ago
I'm not sure about Option C. Sharing rules for a new record? Sounds a bit like a hack to me. I'd go with Option B - different layouts for different user profiles.
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
7 days ago
It's important to consider the user experience when designing the app. Option B seems like a user-friendly solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
11 days ago
Different layouts for different user profiles could definitely simplify the process for users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
17 days ago
It's important to make the user experience as smooth as possible when creating new Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
23 days ago
Option C does seem a bit unconventional. I agree with you, Option B sounds like a better approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
28 days ago
Using different layouts based on user profiles could definitely simplify the process for users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 months ago
Option C does seem a bit unconventional. I agree with you, Option B sounds like a better approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlyn
2 months ago
Option D seems the most straightforward. Just hide the extra fields and let users expand them as needed. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Charisse
13 days ago
I agree. It's a user-friendly approach to managing the additional fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
28 days ago
That's a good point. It would make the initial process quicker for users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
1 months ago
Option D seems the most straightforward. Just hide the extra fields and let users expand them as needed. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lovetta
3 months ago
I see both points, but I think option D could also work. Hiding additional sections until users manually expand them could simplify the initial form.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more user-friendly. Different page layouts based on user profile would make it easier for users to navigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It makes sense to automate filling in the Opportunity type field.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77