Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Financial Services Cloud Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Financial Services Cloud exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All Financial Services Cloud Questions]

An insurance company needs to ensure the record rollups aggregate information from related records for several objects in the Financial Services Cloud at a client or group level.

What should the administrator configure to meet the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The architect at Cumulus Insurance should be aware of the limitation that the administrator can define up to 300 total sharing rules for each object when using the Role Hierarchy and sharing rules to implement the franchise business model. Sharing rules are a way of granting additional access to records based on criteria, such as record owner, role, or field values. The Role Hierarchy is a way of organizing users into a hierarchy that reflects the reporting structure of the company. The Role Hierarchy and sharing rules can be used together to control the access and visibility of records for different users in Financial Services Cloud. However, there is a limit of 300 sharing rules per object, which means that the administrator may need to use other methods, such as public groups or manual sharing, to grant access to records beyond this limit.


[Sharing Rules]

[Role Hierarchy]

[Sharing Rule Limits]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carli
1 months ago
Option A - adding Cases to the Rollup__c field? Sounds like someone's been mixing up their insurance policies and their Salesforce fields.
upvoted 0 times
Yvette
13 days ago
Oh, I see. So, we should use Rollup Summaries to aggregate the information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
16 days ago
No, that won't work. You need to configure Rollup Summaries on the objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
17 days ago
Option A - adding Cases to the Rollup__c field?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Niesha
1 months ago
C looks good, but I'm not sure about the 'Rallup_c' field. Is that a new Salesforce feature or just a typo?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
1 months ago
D? Really? Opportunities on the Household__c field? That's about as useful as a chocolate teapot.
upvoted 0 times
Francesco
1 days ago
I agree, using Opportunities on the Household__c field doesn't seem like the best solution for aggregating information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
12 days ago
Yeah, that doesn't sound right. Maybe they should consider using a custom rollup summary field instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marnie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about adding Cases to the Rollup__c field. Seems like that would just create more confusion.
upvoted 0 times
Sherron
5 hours ago
User1: Agreed, it could create more confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
4 days ago
Adding Cases to the Rollup__c field might not be the best approach, it could indeed create confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
4 days ago
User3: Adding Cases to the Rollup__c field might not be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
8 days ago
User2: Yeah, that would help aggregate information from related records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
17 days ago
Aggregating information from related records would definitely help with reporting at a higher level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
24 days ago
User1: I think the administrator should configure a Rollup Summary Field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
1 months ago
I think the administrator should configure a Rollup Summary Field on the related objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annmarie
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice here. Client-level aggregation is exactly what the requirement calls for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to ensure the record rollups aggregate information accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D, adding Opportunities as a picklist value to the Household__c field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
I think the answer is B, setting up client-level rollups to all primary group members.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77