Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Financial Services Cloud Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Financial Services Cloud exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All Financial Services Cloud Questions]

Lake Tahoe Bank is evaluating Financial Services Cloud to help them deliver a customer-centric view. They currently have a heavily customized Salesforce implementation with a product-centric design. Lake Tahoe Bank wants to make sure planned changes have a minimal impact on users during implementation. What is the recommended approach for implementing Financial Services Cloud at Lake Tahoe Bank?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sommer
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Sandbox testing is the responsible choice, unless Lake Tahoe Bank is feeling lucky and wants to go for the full-on rodeo ride with Option C.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
10 days ago
I agree, we can't afford to take any risks with such a critical system. Let's go with Option D for a smoother implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
16 days ago
Option D is definitely the safer choice. We should prioritize sandbox testing to minimize any disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincenza
2 months ago
I'm scratching my head on this one. Implementing Financial Services Cloud is like trying to swap out the engine of a car while it's still moving. I hope Lake Tahoe Bank has a good mechanic on standby!
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
21 hours ago
User 3: Maybe they can gradually transition to Financial Services Cloud to minimize disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
2 days ago
User 2: They should probably start by assessing their current Salesforce setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
18 days ago
User 1: It sounds like Lake Tahoe Bank has a big task ahead of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think option C might be the most practical. Implementing in the existing org could save time and resources in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go! Implementing Financial Services Cloud in the existing org makes the most sense, as it allows the bank to build on their existing Salesforce setup.
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
1 months ago
I agree, building on what they already have in place is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
1 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. It will make the transition smoother for everyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurene
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go. Testing in a Sandbox first will help identify any issues before rolling out to production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Starting fresh with a green field implementation allows the organization to design the solution from the ground up, taking full advantage of Financial Services Cloud's capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Lucy
23 days ago
User4: Definitely, a new org design can really maximize the benefits of Financial Services Cloud for Lake Tahoe Bank.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
26 days ago
User3: It seems like Option A is the way to go for Lake Tahoe Bank to ensure a smooth transition with minimal impact on users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 months ago
User2: I agree, a green field implementation would allow for a more customer-centric view without the constraints of the current setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
2 months ago
User1: Option A sounds like a good approach. Starting fresh can really optimize the use of Financial Services Cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannetta
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best approach to minimize impact on users during the implementation. Using a sandbox environment to test the changes before deploying to production is a smart way to ensure a smooth transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
3 months ago
I think option A is the best approach. Starting fresh in a new org will allow for a clean implementation without disrupting current processes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77