Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Energy and Utilities Cloud Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Energy and Utilities Cloud exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3
[All Energy and Utilities Cloud Questions]

An energy company implementing Energy and Utilities Cloud needs to generate a contract frame its proposals that include up to 100 line items, with its template already built in a DOCX file. According to the new company branding, custom fonts were used.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Detra
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old battle between fonts and line items. Option D is the clear winner here. Server-Side generation can handle both the custom fonts and the high number of line items. Let's hope the admin doesn't Comic Sans this up!
upvoted 0 times
Vanesa
1 days ago
Let's hope the admin sticks to the new company branding and doesn't mess up the fonts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
3 days ago
I agree, Server-Side generation is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
28 days ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. Server-Side generation can handle everything we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adolph
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. With all these options, I feel like I'm playing a game of 'Font Or Foe'. But seriously, Option D sounds like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
Desire
1 months ago
I agree, Server-Side generation seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nieves
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option E. Server-Side generation is the way to handle a high number of line items. Who needs fancy fonts anyway? Just stick to Times New Roman, it's a classic!
upvoted 0 times
Michell
15 days ago
Times New Roman is a classic choice for fonts, simple and easy to read.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
16 days ago
Yeah, fancy fonts are not as important as efficiently handling a large number of line items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
18 days ago
I agree, Server-Side generation is definitely the way to go for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
1 months ago
I think Option E is the best choice. Server-Side generation is more efficient for a high number of line items.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerri
2 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Server-Side generation can handle custom fonts, and with up to 100 line items, it's the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
2 months ago
But what about the custom fonts? Wouldn't Client-Side generation be better for that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
3 months ago
I agree with Freeman, Server-Side generation is the way to go for a high number of line items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
3 months ago
I think the administrator should recommend Server-Side generation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77