Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Data Architect Topic 5 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Architect exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 5
[All Data Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) owns a complex Salesforce org with many Apex classes, triggers, and automated processes that will modify records if available. UC has identified that, in its current development state, UC runs change of encountering race condition on the same record.

What should a data architect recommend to guarantee that records are not being updated at the same time?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Using Bulk API to export 1 million records from Salesforce is the best option. Bulk API is a RESTful API that allows you to perform asynchronous operations on large sets of data. You can use Bulk API to create, update, delete, or query millions of records in batches. Bulk API is optimized for performance and scalability, and it can handle complex data loading scenarios.


by Allene at Mar 06, 2024, 12:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Data Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Myra
1 months ago
Migrating to processes and flows? Sounds like a smart move. It's like upgrading from a flip phone to a smartphone - more control and less headaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
1 months ago
Disabling classes or triggers? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet by turning off the water supply. Not very practical.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
8 days ago
A) Embed the keywords FOR UPDATE after SOQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
13 days ago
C) Migrate programmatic logic to processes and flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
17 days ago
B) Disable classes or triggers that have the potential to obtain the same record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
29 days ago
A) Embed the keywords FOR UPDATE after SOQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isadora
2 months ago
Embedding the 'FOR UPDATE' keyword seems like the obvious choice to me. It's like putting a 'do not disturb' sign on the record.
upvoted 0 times
Melvin
1 days ago
User 4: Migrating programmatic logic to processes and flows could be a good solution too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
3 days ago
User 3: Disabling classes or triggers that might access the same record could also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
5 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it's like putting a 'do not disturb' sign on the record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
27 days ago
User 1: I think embedding the 'FOR UPDATE' keyword is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
2 months ago
Whoa, race conditions in a Salesforce org? That's like trying to herd cats while juggling chainsaws!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
2 months ago
But wouldn't migrating programmatic logic to processes and flows also help prevent race conditions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
2 months ago
I agree with Dorthy. That would ensure records are not updated at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
3 months ago
I think we should embed the keywords FOR UPDATE after SOQL statements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77