Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Data Architect Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Architect exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All Data Architect Questions]

UC is migrating data from legacy system to SF. UC would like to preserve the following information on records being migrated:

Date time stamps for created date and last modified date.

Ownership of records belonging to inactive users being migrated to Salesforce.

Which 2 solutions should a data architect recommends to preserve the date timestamps and ownership on records? Choose 2 answers.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Donte
3 days ago
I think A and C are the best solutions to ensure the date timestamps and ownership are preserved during the migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
3 days ago
What is this, a game of Salesforce Tetris? C and B, no doubt. Let's not make a mess of this migration, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
7 days ago
I'm all about that Option C - setting those audit fields on creation is the way to go. Keeps things nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
14 days ago
I'm not sure about D, but C definitely seems like a good option to preserve the date timestamps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
14 days ago
Hmm, I'm thinking C and maybe B. Can't have those timestamps and ownership details getting lost in the migration, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
16 days ago
I agree with Jesus, C and D make sense to preserve the timestamps and ownership.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
22 days ago
D? Really? That's like using a flamethrower to light a candle. Overkill much?
upvoted 0 times
Roslyn
9 days ago
C) Enable Set Audit fields upon Record Creation Permission
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauryn
1 months ago
I'd go with B and C. Gotta make sure we preserve ownership and timestamps, no matter what.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
1 months ago
Option C definitely seems the way to go. Keeping those audit fields up-to-date is crucial for data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 months ago
I think C and D are the correct solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77