Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Data Architect Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Architect exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All Data Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) plans to implement consent management for its customers to be compliant with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). UC has the following requirements:

UC uses Person Accounts and Contacts in Salesforce for its customers.

Data Protection and Privacy is enabled in Salesforce.

Consent should be maintained in both these objects.

UC plans to verify the consent provided by customers before contacting them through email or phone.

Which option should the data architect recommend to implement these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Identifying a location to store archived data and using scheduled batch jobs to migrate and purge the aged data on a nightly basis can be a way to meet the requirements for an archive solution. The article provides a use case of how to use Heroku Connect, Postgres, and Salesforce Connect to archive old data, free up space in the org, and still retain the option to unarchive the data if needed. The article also explains how this solution can improve Salesforce performance and meet data retention policies.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Andra
1 months ago
Option D? Really? Deleting customer data? That's like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Definitely go with Option C and let Salesforce handle the consent management for you.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
1 months ago
Option B sounds like a lot of extra work. Why build a custom object when Salesforce has the Consent Management Feature built-in? C is the way to go, easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
Paulene
13 days ago
I think it's important to utilize the features already available in Salesforce for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
19 days ago
Yeah, using the built-in Consent Management Feature would definitely save time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
22 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Miesha
2 months ago
Haha, deleting contact information? What is this, the mafia? Option C is the only sensible choice here. Consent management is important, but let's not get carried away.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
2 months ago
I'm not sure about deleting contact information just because someone declined consent. That seems like it could create more problems than it solves. Option C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Ashlyn
11 days ago
Deleting contact information seems extreme. Option C is a more reasonable approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
17 days ago
I agree, using the Consent Management Feature is the most secure and compliant option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
18 days ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. It's important to respect customer consent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
2 months ago
Option C seems to be the way to go. Using the Consent Management Feature built into Salesforce is a great way to simplify the process and ensure compliance with GDPR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C might be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
2 months ago
I agree with Maryln, custom fields in Person Account and Contact make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77