Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CRT-450 Topic 7 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-450 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 7
[All CRT-450 Questions]

A developer is migrating a Visualforce page into a Lightning web component.

The Visualforce page shows information about a single record. The developer decides to use Lightning Data Service to access record data.

Which security consideration should the developer be aware of?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Wilford at Jul 02, 2024, 04:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-450 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Benton
1 months ago
Hey, at least the developer isn't migrating a Visualforce page to Apex. Now that would be a real security nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
1 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to have to go with option D. Better safe than sorry when it comes to security, right? Although, knowing Salesforce, they probably built in some kind of security wizardry into Lightning Data Service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 months ago
Ha! Looks like someone's trying to trick us. Of course the developer has to use the isAccessible() method. What, does Lightning Data Service have some kind of magical security powers or something?
upvoted 0 times
Devon
7 days ago
D: That's good to know. It's always important to consider security when migrating to a new platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
15 days ago
C: Lightning Data Service actually handles sharing rules and field-level security, so it's not just magical powers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
15 days ago
B: Yeah, I agree. It's important to make sure the developer is aware of that security consideration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
20 days ago
A: I think the developer should use the isAccessible() method for field-level access checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Didn't I read somewhere that Lightning Data Service doesn't automatically enforce field-level security? Better double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
16 days ago
User 3: The isAccessible() method must be used for field-level access checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
19 days ago
User 2: I'm not so sure about that. I read that it doesn't automatically enforce field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
22 days ago
User 3: The isAccessible() method must be used for field-level access checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
26 days ago
User 2: I'm not so sure about that. Better double-check if it ignores field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 months ago
User 1: I think Lightning Data Service handles sharing rules and field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
1 months ago
User 1: I think Lightning Data Service handles sharing rules and field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Solange
2 months ago
Option C seems like the obvious choice here. Lightning Data Service is designed to handle all the security considerations, so the developer doesn't have to worry about it.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
1 months ago
That's right, Lightning Data Service simplifies the security aspect for developers. It's a great tool to use for accessing record data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 months ago
I agree, option C is the best choice. Lightning Data Service takes care of both sharing rules and field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to ensure data security when accessing record data in the new component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 months ago
I believe option C is the correct answer, as Lightning Data Service handles sharing rules and field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
3 months ago
I think the developer should be aware of security considerations when migrating to Lightning web component.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77