Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-403 Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All CRT-403 Questions]

Ursa Major Solar (UMS) has a custom object where they track Galactic Vendors. The object has four custom fields for the Galactic Vendors's location:

The UMS's leadership wants these fields to be concatenated into a single formula field on two lines.

Which formula fulfills this requirement?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To manage field editability based on the opportunity status:

C . Use field-level security on page layouts with record types to restrict editing fields. This combination allows for different layouts and editable fields based on the status of the record (e.g., closed or open).

Steps to implement:

Create or adjust record types for open and closed opportunities.

For each record type, create a specific page layout.

On the page layout for closed opportunities, set the majority of fields to read-only using field-level security, except for the 'Post-Close Follow-up Date' and 'Post-Close Follow-up Comments' fields.

Assign the appropriate page layouts to the respective record types.

Update profiles or permission sets to use these record types and page layouts accordingly.

This setup ensures that sales reps can modify fields only when the opportunity is open, and the sales operations team can edit specific fields after closure.

For more information on using record types and page layouts, check Salesforce's documentation on Record Types.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ernest
1 months ago
May the Formula be with you, young Padawans. Clearly, the answer is D. Anything less would be a disturbance in the Force.
upvoted 0 times
Shelia
1 days ago
No way, it's definitely C. Trust me on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
9 days ago
I think the answer is A, not D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ligia
1 months ago
I'm torn between B and D, but I think I'll go with D. Who doesn't love a little SUBSTITUTE action in their formula fields?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
2 months ago
Hmm, Option A seems a bit messy with all the CONCAT functions. I think Option C is the way to go - simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
Chauncey
2 days ago
Let's go with Option C then, it's the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
4 days ago
I agree, Option C seems much simpler and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 months ago
Let's go with Option C for the concatenated formula field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
1 months ago
Option A looks too complicated with all the CONCAT functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
1 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the simpler and more effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 months ago
Option A looks complicated with all the CONCAT functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alberta
2 months ago
I'm going with Option D. The vertical layout and use of SUBSTITUTE to add the line break make it look the most polished and professional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
Option B looks the most concise and readable. Concatenating the fields into a single formula field on two lines seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
14 days ago
I prefer Option C, it seems more visually appealing to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
15 days ago
I think so too. It's important for the formula to be clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
19 days ago
I agree, Option B looks clean and easy to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittni
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Option C could also work based on the requirements given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
2 months ago
I agree with Honey, Option B seems to be the best choice for concatenating the fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
3 months ago
I think the correct formula is Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77