Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CRT-101 Topic 7 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-101 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 7
[All CRT-101 Questions]

The administrator at cloud kicks is trying to debug a screen flow that create contacts. One of

the variables in the flow is missing on the debug screen.

What could cause this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

To use as an identifier when importing and updating records from a separate system, an administrator should use External ID field type on an object. External ID fields allow storing unique identifiers from external systems and using them for matching records during import or update operations. External ID fields can also be used for upsert operations that insert new records or update existing ones based on external ID values. For example, an administrator can create an External ID field on Account object that stores account numbers from an external ERP system and use it for importing or updating accounts from that system. Rich Text field, Record ID, and Auto-Number field are not suitable for using as identifiers when importing and updating records from a separate system. Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.fields_about_field_types.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.data_loader_upsert.htm&type=5


by Ettie at Dec 24, 2023, 03:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Onita
2 months ago
Wait, did they say 'cloud kicks'? Is that the new startup offering sneaker-based cloud computing? I'm intrigued!
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
7 days ago
C) The field type is unsupported by debugging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
22 days ago
B) The flow is an inactive version
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
27 days ago
A) The available for input checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
Option B? Really? An inactive version of the flow causing issues? That's like blaming the car for not starting when the keys are in your pocket.
upvoted 0 times
Ming
17 days ago
Option B? Really? An inactive version of the flow causing issues? That's like blaming the car for not starting when the keys are in your pocket.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
18 days ago
D) The available for output checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
29 days ago
C) The field type is unsupported by debugging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
1 months ago
B) The flow is an inactive version
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 months ago
A) The available for input checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nikita
2 months ago
Nah, it's gotta be option C. The field type being unsupported by debugging is a classic gotcha in these flow-related questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. If the available for output checkbox was unchecked, that could explain the missing variable.
upvoted 0 times
Fabiola
9 days ago
User 4: Fabiola might be onto something. That could definitely be the cause of the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
10 days ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but I think it might be option D. If the available for output checkbox was unchecked, that could explain the missing variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
28 days ago
User 2: I agree with Valentine, it does make sense. Maybe that's the reason why the variable is missing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 months ago
User 1: I think it could be option A. If the available for input checkbox was unchecked, that could cause the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Naomi
2 months ago
I think it could be because the available for output checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the problem might be that the field type is unsupported by debugging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
2 months ago
I think the issue could be that the available for input checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
2 months ago
I think it's option A. The available for input checkbox being unchecked would definitely cause the variable to be missing on the debug screen.
upvoted 0 times
Walker
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, that checkbox being unchecked would definitely hide the variable on the debug screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
1 months ago
User1: I agree, option A seems like the most likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
1 months ago
Yeah, I think so too. It's important to make sure all checkboxes are checked for debugging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the most likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malissa
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe the field type being unsupported by debugging could also be a possible cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 months ago
I agree with Lindsey, that could definitely cause the variable to be missing on the debug screen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
I think the issue could be that the available for input checkbox was unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77