Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-101 Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-101 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 2
[All CRT-101 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sherita
1 months ago
I heard Universal Containers is also introducing a new product called 'Case Herding 2000' - it's like a digital cattle prod for your support team. Guaranteed to get those cases moving!
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of case management. I wonder if they've considered just yelling the cases at the engineers from across the room. Might be more efficient than all this 'automation' nonsense.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
19 days ago
B) That sounds like a good idea. It would streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
20 days ago
A) Create a queue and a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Socorro
1 months ago
D? Really? An auto-response rule and a public group? That sounds like a recipe for chaos. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Genevive
2 days ago
C) Create a user-based sharing rule and an ad-hoc case team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
10 days ago
B) Create a predefined case team and an assignment rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
20 days ago
A) Create a queue and a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sommer
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards A. A queue and a criteria-based sharing rule seems like a more automated and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Rosio
5 days ago
A queue and criteria-based sharing rule would definitely streamline the process for the new product cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
19 days ago
I think A is the most efficient way to give the lead engineers access to the cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
23 days ago
I agree, A seems like the best option for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristine
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. C seems like a viable option too. A user-based sharing rule and an ad-hoc case team could work just as well.
upvoted 0 times
Amos
8 days ago
User 3: I'm not so sure. C seems like a viable option too. A user-based sharing rule and an ad-hoc case team could work just as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
18 days ago
User 2: I agree with Artie. That sounds like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
29 days ago
User 1: I think A is the best option. Create a queue and a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I think the answer is B. A predefined case team and an assignment rule would be the best way to give the two lead engineers the necessary access.
upvoted 0 times
Vivienne
29 days ago
Creating a predefined case team and an assignment rule would definitely streamline the process for the lead engineers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most appropriate solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
1 months ago
Creating a predefined case team and an assignment rule would definitely streamline access for the lead engineers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most appropriate solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyisha
3 months ago
Creating a predefined case team and an assignment rule could also work, but I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
3 months ago
I agree with Sheridan. That way the lead engineers can have access to all new cases related to the new product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
3 months ago
I think the administrator should create a queue and a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77