Salesforce Exam CPQ-301 Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CPQ-301 exam

Question #: 30
Topic #: 4

[All CPQ-301 Questions]

Universal Containers wants to allow customers to return and receive credit for asset Products.

How should the admm meat the requirement?

ASet Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and set a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote.

BSet Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and reduce the Quantity on the Amendment Quote.

CEdit the Quantity field on the Asset record to reflect the updated Quantity.

DEdit the Effective Quantity field on the Asset record to reflect the updated Quantity.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by An at Aug 05, 2023, 04:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPQ-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sabina

2 months ago

Wait, they want us to do what now? Return and receive credit for asset Products? I thought we were just selling widgets, not running a used car lot!

upvoted 0 times

Katie

14 days ago

Wait, they want us to do what now? Return and receive credit for asset Products? I thought we were just selling widgets, not running a used car lot!

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

22 days ago

B) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and reduce the Quantity on the Amendment Quote.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

24 days ago

A) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and set a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelle

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Editing the Effective Quantity field on the Asset record? That's just asking for trouble. Option B is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

Sanda

14 days ago

Setting Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund and reducing the Quantity makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabine

15 days ago

Option B is definitely the safer choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

1 months ago

I agree, editing the Effective Quantity field seems risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

2 months ago

Hold up, are we sure we can't just set the Quantity to a negative value? That would be a pretty slick solution. Option A all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Felton

8 days ago

Lyndia: Hmm, that's a good point. Both options could work, but I still think Option A is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rikki

15 days ago

User 3: I'm not so sure about that. Maybe reducing the Quantity on the Amendment Quote would be better. Option B could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

20 days ago

User 2: Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

2 months ago

User 1: I think setting a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote is the way to go. Option A is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

2 months ago

I'm not sure why we would need to edit the Quantity field on the Asset record. That seems like it could lead to data integrity issues. Option B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Edward

1 months ago

User 2: Definitely, Option B seems like the safer choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

2 months ago

User 1: I agree, editing the Quantity field directly could cause problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wayne

2 months ago

Option B seems the most straightforward way to handle this requirement. Reducing the quantity on the amendment quote is the logical approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think both A) and B) could work depending on the specific scenario. We should consider the implications of each option before making a decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and reduce the Quantity on the Amendment Quote.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willow

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) Set Asset Amendment Behavior to Allow Refund for the Product and set a negative Quantity on the Amendment Quote.

upvoted 0 times

...