Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Developer Topic 1 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Developer exam

Question #: 89
Topic #: 1

[All B2C Commerce Developer Questions]

A developer is writing a server side script that needs to maintain state across calls. The persistent

information needed includes these items.

* The current customer

* Whether or not the customer is authenticated

* The privacy attributes (such as tracking consent or cookie policy)

Which technique should the developer use to maintain state in an efficient and scalable manner that

follows best practice?

AUse a non-replicable Custom Object to store the information temporarily.

BUse the Session class in the B2C Commerce api.

CUse an SFRA controller, because it runs server-side, the state is automatically maintained

DUse a client-side cookie to store the information for the session duration.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Loren at Apr 03, 2025, 01:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2C Commerce Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Felice

2 months ago

Option B all the way! The Session class is like a superhero for state management. It's not only efficient, but it also keeps your code clean and secure.

upvoted 0 times

Ronnie

6 days ago

Using a client-side cookie might not be as secure as using the Session class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Enola

14 days ago

Plus, it helps with managing privacy attributes like tracking consent.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elly

1 months ago

It's great for keeping track of the current customer and their authentication status.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felice

1 months ago

I agree, the Session class is definitely the way to go for maintaining state.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

2 months ago

I'm a bit skeptical of using a Custom Object. Seems like a lot of overhead for a simple state management task. Let's stick to the standard API tools.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

2 months ago

C seems like a good option. SFRA controllers automatically maintain state, so it's a hassle-free solution. Plus, it's server-side, so it's more secure than client-side cookies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

2 months ago

D is the simplest solution, but I'm not sure it's the most efficient or secure. Cookies can be tampered with, and storing sensitive information like authentication status in them isn't ideal.

upvoted 0 times

Kathryn

24 days ago

B) Use the Session class in the B2C Commerce api.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

25 days ago

A) Use a non-replicable Custom Object to store the information temporarily temporarily.

upvoted 0 times

...

Destiny

2 months ago

But wouldn't using a client-side cookie be easier to implement and maintain?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

2 months ago

I think option B is the way to go. The Session class in the B2C Commerce API is designed for this exact use case. It's scalable and follows best practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe using an SFRA controller would be more efficient and scalable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Destiny

2 months ago

I think the best option is to use the Session class in the B2C Commerce api.

upvoted 0 times

...